The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving ahead with a major structural overhaul that will shift more than half of its Washington, D.C.–based workforce into five regional hubs by the end of 2026, according to Deputy Agriculture Secretary Stephen Vaden.
Speaking on Agri-Pulse Newsmakers, Vaden said USDA will “redistribute the majority of our employees” to new hub locations and existing leased office spaces over the next year. The regional hubs are located in:
-
Raleigh, North Carolina
-
Kansas City, Missouri
-
Indianapolis, Indiana
-
Fort Collins, Colorado
-
Salt Lake City, Utah
More than 2,000 USDA employees will be transitioned out of D.C., reducing the national capital region’s staffing from 4,600 to no more than 2,000. Vaden noted that public announcements about the moves will continue “in the days and weeks ahead.”
Congress Pushes Back with Oversight Requirements
However, new provisions in the recently passed agriculture funding bill may complicate USDA’s timeline.
As reported by Civil Eats, several appropriations directives now require USDA to secure Congressional approval before:
-
Closing NRCS, Rural Development, or Farm Service Agency field offices
-
Relocating employees if the move would leave an office with two or fewer staff
-
Eliminating programs, reorganizing offices, or shifting staff between locations
The bill also mandates at least $15 million be used to hire employees to fill current and anticipated vacancies in FSA county offices.
Policy groups say these measures reinforce Congress’s role in USDA oversight. “This makes more clear that Congress is a partner with USDA and needs to be informed,” said Mike Lavender of the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.
Critics: USDA Didn’t Consult Farmers or Stakeholders
Opposition to the reorganization continues to grow, with farm groups and former USDA officials warning that the plan was developed without adequate stakeholder input.
Reporting from Politico highlighted concerns raised at a July Senate Agriculture Committee hearing, where Vaden acknowledged USDA did not consult groups like the American Farm Bureau Federation or National Farmers Union.
“Do they want to make it work better for farmers across the country? Good. Go meet with them,” said Robert Bonnie, former USDA undersecretary for farm production and conservation.
Others warn that relocating staff without farmer feedback risks reduced service capacity. “Without input from farmers, the proposed USDA reorganization would close offices and lead to further staff reductions — and ultimately farmers would pay the price,” Lavender said in reporting from Progressive Farmer.
What It Means for Producers
For producers across the U.S., the outcomes of this reorganization could affect:
-
Access to county-level FSA and NRCS services
-
Speed of program delivery and loan processing
-
Staffing stability in rural offices
-
Future policy direction under a decentralized USDA structure
As the USDA moves forward — and Congress underscores its oversight authority — producers will be watching closely to see how the changes affect day-to-day support and long-term program access.
